Archive

Monthly Archives: October 2006

I’ve struggled a bit in the past to find an effective, and light, method for planning. I was very pleased to find this image, and this description, for a Single Step Guide to Success (from Heath Bunting).

Some excerpts from the guide:

Follow your day plan almost to the letter unless itstates; do not look in shop windows or at attractivepeople.

Perhaps, see yourself as an actor following ascript.

Consider what might go wrong in your day and runthrough your mind positive actions. This shouldensure that your on-the-ground response will beconstructive.

Note any compulsion to stray from your day plan orany avoidance of any activity or location.

Do not think ill thoughts of others as this willhinder your progress.

Do not worry, its either being dealt with on today'splan or you can add it to tomorrow's.

Do not at any time call yourself a day plan artistor maker. If you are already a day plannist thenseek help from a psychologist.

Just last week I heard a replay of a Fresh Air interview with Michael Weiskopf on NPR. He was talking about the injuries he received on picking up a grenade tossed into the back of a Humvee where he and photojournalist James Nachtwey were riding in a tour of Baghdad. Both were injured and recovered, but Maass talked of the photograph he has in his workstation–the photo that Nachtwey took immediately after the grenade exploded and before he blacked out.

Nachtwey is one of three honored today with the TED Prize (the others are Bill Clinton and biologist E.O. Wilson). The prize seems singular. It is an award of $100,000 to use on a project–One Worldchanging Wish–yet to be dreamed up by each of the people awarded it. TED has also arranged commitments of finding from it “community” and other supporters.

Our winners are likely to have exceptional abilities in at least one of the following areas:

Invention
Perhaps they have created a new device or system or process capable of impacting millions of people for the better. They may be brilliant scientists, or the inspired designers of simple, cheap technologies.

Creativity
They may be artists, uniting people through shared emotion. They may be film-makers, potters, painters, poets, dancers, sculptors, story-tellers, beauty-makers.

Vision
They can perhaps unlock the power of possibility. They can help us understand, through inspired insight, our personal and universal potential and predicament. They are today’s prophets.

Leadership
They may attract loyalty and respect. They may inspire the support of talented colleagues and employees. They may build powerful teams, capable of dramatically leveraging the impact of their efforts.

Persuasion
They may be powerful communicators, whether face-to-face, or via the Internet, the classroom, the newspaper or the screen. They connect hemispheres and households. They may be teachers or catalysts, troubadours or town criers, campaigners or nay-sayers. When they write and speak, they change people’s minds.

Determination
They are likely to be relentless in pursuing their goals. They never give up.


I love coincidences in cruising the Web. After that last post on houses made of scrap, I happened upon this collection of scrapped houses.

Polar Inertia does a wonderful job of collecting and posting these great portfolios on urban typologies. This one is on Flint, Michigan (not too far away). This collection is only one case study of the sadness of the devastation of communities brought by the selfishness, lack of imagination, inertia, etc., of the American car industry.

I missed what must have been a great program on the National Geographic Channel. In a World Environment Day challenge, a group of SF architects, building officials and others were challenged to design and blitz-build a single-family house made of scrap.

It was a lovely, Modernist piece. “It risked looking like a bunch of scrap nailed together,” says Jensen. “But it ended up being wonderful. It really delighted people. You could see it on their faces when they came through.”

Apparently the Scraphouse site still exists: http://www.scraphouse.org/
Photo by Cesar Robio via SFGate

Design Observer always has some very good writing on design, and frequently on architecture.

This article–What’s that crashing sound? –is Michael Beirut’s recollection about the evolution of the University of Cincinnatti campus and the contribution of Graves:

Through some impossible feat of topology, he had simply taken the existing building complex, dropped it straight through its own bleak heart, and smashed it. Then he took the gloriously twisted result, and built it, full size, right where it landed. And there it stands, ten years later.

I can’t say it made sense to drop those old metal stools back when I was a college junior. I can’t say that Eisenman’s spaces make sense. I don’t know why we did it, and I don’t know why he did it. All I can say for sure is that sometimes something just feels right. And all these years later, I can still hear that crashing sound.


I don’t know whether this in general circulation or not, but I have not seen it anywhere but here.

And if you have not seen it, you must view this amazing Sony Bravia ad with these astonishing exploding buildings.

From the director:

Our latest TV ad – featuring massive paint explosions – took 10 days and 250 people to film. Huge quantities of paint were needed to accomplish this, which had to be delivered in 1 tonne trucks and mixed on-site by 20 people.

The effect was stunning, but afterwards a major clean-up operation was required to clear away all that paint!

The cleaning took 5 days and 60 people. Thankfully, the use of a special water-based paint made it easy to scrape-up once the water had evaporated.

Keeping everyone safe was also an important factor. A special kind of non-toxic paint was used that is safe enough to drink (it contains the same thickeners that are sometimes used in soups). It was also completely harmless to the skin.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,371 other followers